<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Benefit Specialists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Disability insurance more crucial than you may think</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/disability-insurance-more-crucial-than-you-may-think/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/disability-insurance-more-crucial-than-you-may-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Disability insurance is one of the most overlooked products in the insurance industry. No one wants to think about how different life would be if you were suddenly disabled and couldn’t work, as a result of an accident or illness.</p> <p>But how about this fact: Between the ages of 25 and 65, you’re four [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disability insurance is one of the most overlooked products in the insurance industry. No one wants to think about how different life would be if you were suddenly disabled and couldn’t work, as a result of an accident or illness.</p>
<p>But how about this fact: Between the ages of 25 and 65, you’re four times more likely to be disabled than to die.</p>
<p>Unlike life insurance, disability insurance is not there just to protect your loved ones when you are gone. Disability insurance is designed to give you monthly income to continue to pay your mortgage, rent, or car payment — even though you can’t work.</p>
<p>Yes, Social Security does have a disability program (SSDI). But it is notoriously difficult to access that coverage, and you might even need a lawyer to help you press your claim. The process could take years.</p>
<p>That’s why you need to consider buying your own coverage — even if you have some coverage at work. That employer-paid policy may not be transferrable if you leave your job, and the benefits are likely to be taxed if you need to use the policy. But if you purchase a disability insurance policy on your own, with after-tax dollars, any benefits will come to you tax-free.</p>
<p>Generally speaking, disability insurance is a good idea even in your twenties, and especially if you have no one else to provide for the basic costs of daily living in case you become disabled. Single parents might also have a special need for this insurance.</p>
<p>As you reach your late fifties, and are closer to receiving Social Security retirement income benefits, you might want to switch your premium dollars to long-term care insurance, which becomes the greater and more costly risk.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Disability coverage and costs</strong></p>
<p>How much coverage do you need? Of course, you’d like to replace all your income if you are unable to work. But no insurance company is going to write a policy that gives you that incentive! Instead you will probably qualify to replace only about 60 percent of your current income, which must be documented at the time of purchase.</p>
<p>The higher your income, the smaller the percentage the insurance company will replace. That is, if you earn $50,000 a year, you could replace 60 percent of your earnings, but if you are a highly paid professional earning $300,000 a year, you will probably max out with benefits of $10,000 per month.</p>
<p>The amount of coverage and cost will also depend on your occupation. Almost paradoxically, the higher income professions such as lawyer and doctor, pay less per dollar of coverage — and get more lengthy coverage — than a carpenter or electrician, who may qualify for only five years of disability payouts. Insurance companies divide professions into classes — and the coverage and price will depend on your type of work.</p>
<p>One important issue with disability insurance is the definition of disability. It is more expensive to purchase a policy that pays out if you are unable to do your “own occupation.” For example, a surgeon who loses the use of one hand could still do other work as a medical professional — but it surely means she can’t perform as a surgeon. The policy will pay because she is unable to do her own profession. Make sure your coverage guarantees payment even if you are not totally and permanently disabled from any kind of gainful employment.</p>
<p>The annual cost should be about 2 to 3 percent of your current income to protect your future income. According to AccuQuote, a 30-year-old male who makes $40,000 a year would pay about $733 per year for coverage that replaces 69 percent of his salary.</p>
<p>A 40-year-old woman who earns $50,000 could replace 68 percent of her salary for an annual premium of approximately $2,000 a year. In each case the benefits would continue to age 67, at which time you could access Social Security retirement benefits. And, if you’re willing to pay slightly more, you can get additional inflation protection.</p>
<p>Be careful to deal with a top-rated insurance company (Guardian, Unum, for example) to make sure that you will be getting the payout without a hassle if and when the time comes to trigger your policy. Since there are so many variables in this kind of insurance, you’ll have to deal with a specialist. For quotes on disability insurance go to www.AccuQuote.com or call (800) 442-9899.</p>
<p>It’s worth checking out this “paycheck insurance.” You’ll never know how valuable that income is — unless you lose it for health reasons. That’s the Savage Truth.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By Terry Savage, published on www.suntimes.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/disability-insurance-more-crucial-than-you-may-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heightened Awareness: Small businesses address today&#8217;s worker vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/heightened-awareness-small-businesses-address-todays-worker-vulnerabilities/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/heightened-awareness-small-businesses-address-todays-worker-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>May is full of important health and wellness awareness dates, including Employee Health &#38; Fitness Month, Disability Awareness Month and Women’s Health Week (May 13-19).</p> <p>However, whether or not small businesses recognize these and other official declarations, there are two critical observations decision-makers need to make about their employees today, and consider year-round, because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May is full of important health and wellness awareness dates, including Employee Health &amp; Fitness Month, Disability Awareness Month and Women’s Health Week (May 13-19).</p>
<p>However, whether or not small businesses recognize these and other official declarations, there are two critical observations decision-makers need to make about their employees today, and consider year-round, because of their potential to directly impact business productivity and turnover costs.</p>
<p>First, U.S. workers are in denial about the likelihood of accidents and serious illnesses. In addition, they are not prepared to handle the financial consequences of unexpected health issues.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Workers’ Unrealistic Health Optimism</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>When it comes to anticipating a serious illness or accident, Americans may be overly optimistic. According to the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Facts &amp; Figures 2012, one in three women and one in two men will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives. The American Heart Association’s Heart Disease &amp; Stroke Statistics 2012 shows that one in six U.S. deaths in 2008, was caused by coronary heart disease.</p>
<p>Despite these findings, the 2012 Aflac WorkForces Report revealed six out of 10 workers (62 percent) think it’s not very or not at all likely they or a family member will be diagnosed with a serious illness like cancer, and more than half (55 percent) said they were not very or not at all likely to be diagnosed with a chronic illness, such as heart disease or diabetes.</p>
<p>In addition, despite optimism about their physical health, the study reveals that American workers also are concerned about their financial health, and many admit they are unprepared to handle the financial consequences of a serious illness or accident in their family.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Financial Strain &amp; Productivity Drain</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Half of American workers (51 percent) are trying to reduce debt, according to the Aflac study, and nearly six in 10 (58 percent) don’t have a financial plan to handle the unexpected. In addition, only eight percent of U.S. workers strongly agree their family will be financially prepared in the event of an unexpected emergency, and 28 percent have less than $500 (51 percent have less than $1,000) in savings for emergency expenses.</p>
<p>These are among the personal challenges weighing on workers’ minds daily and impacting individual productivity through absenteeism and distracted work. Decision-makers are keenly aware. In fact, 63 percent of leaders at small businesses believe that productivity is lost because employees are concerned about personal issues, according to the study.</p>
<p>The fact that American workers aren’t aware of their medical risks and the potential financial impact of those risks is a very real concern that is only compounded when workers don’t take full advantage of available benefits options or adjust their savings strategies to be more prepared.</p>
<p>For example, when asked how they would pay for out-of-pocket expenses due to an unexpected illness, the study found that more than half (57 percent) of respondents said they would have to tap into savings, 30 percent would use a credit card and 19 percent—nearly one out of five people—would have to withdraw funds from their 401(k) plans to cover the costs.</p>
<p>Now, more than ever, American workers need to understand that well-being means more than just good health—it’s being prepared for the reality of whatever life may bring and taking the necessary measures to protect themselves and their families. A very real connection exists between health and finances—a worker’s financial stability and employment security can be threatened by an unexpected illness or accident, and conversely, the ability to obtain adequate medical care can be influenced by finances.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Many Benefits of Employer Action</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Most individuals are looking to their employers to educate them about all available benefits options, not just traditional benefits changes or choices, to better understand how they can have a more secure safety net.</p>
<p>The Aflac study revealed that 58 percent of employees at small businesses would be likely to purchase voluntary health insurance plans if offered by their employer. Yet, small businesses are least likely to offer voluntary insurance policies (just 19 percent, compared to 41 percent of medium-sized and large companies) for various reasons, including the common misconception that these policies will increase their health care costs. Workers’ perceived lack of benefits understanding also is a limiting factor.</p>
<p>For example, only 19 percent of HR decision-makers at small businesses believe their employees are extremely/very knowledgeable about voluntary benefits.</p>
<p>However, despite these low figures, small businesses excel at putting employees’ benefits interests first. The study found that small businesses are more likely than medium-sized and large businesses to rank taking care of employees as their top objective, with 23 percent ranking it first. More small businesses are realizing that making group voluntary insurance policies available to employees has no direct cost and may reduce corporate taxes by cutting FICA tax contributions.</p>
<p>Additionally, savvy decision-makers are seeing the value of voluntary plans to not only enhance a company’s benefits package and competitive status versus larger organizations’ benefits programs, but they can demonstrate to employees that they matter and ultimately help avoid the high cost of turnover.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Once benefit options are added or expanded, it’s critical for employers to effectively communicate year-round about how new benefit options like voluntary insurance can help with high out-of-pocket expenses associated with a serious illness or accident. By doing so, businesses can not only help their workers have a better understanding of the options that are right for them, but also help reduce common mistakes made during the enrollment process, generate stronger retention, and build greater appreciation for their total compensation packages.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Published on www.businessinsider.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/heightened-awareness-small-businesses-address-todays-worker-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job front: More employers offer flex time as an employee benefit, study shows</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/job-front-more-employers-offer-flex-time-as-an-employee-benefit-study-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/job-front-more-employers-offer-flex-time-as-an-employee-benefit-study-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Employers are showing more flexibility with their workers, a new report reveals, with more firms offering time during the day to attend to family and personal matters and flex time.</p> <p>The news comes out of the 2012 National Study of Employers by the workforce think tank Families and Work Institute, released jointly April 30 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employers are showing more flexibility with their workers, a new report reveals, with more firms offering time during the day to attend to family and personal matters and flex time.</p>
<p>The news comes out of the 2012 National Study of Employers by the workforce think tank Families and Work Institute, released jointly April 30 with the Society for Human Resource Management.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s researchers found what they called surprising increases in the numbers of employers who allowed workers to alter when they started and ended their work days, to work from home and to determine their paid and unpaid overtime hours.</p>
<p>Consider the findings:</p>
<p>• 77 percent of employers allow at least some employees to use flex time and periodically change their start and quit times – up from 66 percent in 2005.</p>
<p>• 87 percent allow employees to take time during the work day to tend to family or personal affairs without a dock in pay. In 2005, 77 percent of employers allowed it.</p>
<p>• 63 percent of employers allow employees to occasionally work from home – nearly double that of 2005, when 34 percent of employers allowed staffers to work from home.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s not much of a surprise. Employers working with ever-smaller staffs are beginning to take the long view, finding more ways to accommodate and retain employees.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s clear that, in order to remain competitive, employers must find ways to offer flexible work options if they want to attract and retain top talent,&#8221; said Henry Jackson, president and chief executive officer of the Society for Human Resource Management.</p>
<p>As a result, employees&#8217; schedules are more malleable, researchers said, allowing employees to work longer days or shape their <a href="http://topics.sacbee.com/work+hours/" rel="nofollow">work hours</a> to take care of personal responsibilities and still produce at the office, said Ellen Galinsky, Families and Work Institute president and one of the study&#8217;s authors.</p>
<p>&#8220;Although some may have expected employers to cut back on flexibility entirely during this economic downturn, we are seeing employers leverage flexibility as they look toward the future,&#8221; Galinsky said.</p>
<p>Read the complete report at <a href="http://www.whenworkworks.org/" target="_blank">www.whenworkworks.org</a> or<a href="http://www.familiesandwork.org/" target="_blank">www.familiesandwork.org</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By Darrell Smith, published by www.sacbee.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/job-front-more-employers-offer-flex-time-as-an-employee-benefit-study-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for buying long-term care insurance</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/tips-for-buying-long-term-care-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/tips-for-buying-long-term-care-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My column a few months back about qualifying for Medicaid drew lots of reactions. While many thanked me for the tips, others pointed out that I should have been more clear about the great variation in regulations from state to state. Still others felt that sheltering assets while depending on the state for elder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My column a few months back about qualifying for Medicaid drew lots of reactions. While many thanked me for the tips, others pointed out that I should have been more clear about the great variation in regulations from state to state. Still others felt that sheltering assets while depending on the state for elder care is unfair to other taxpayers.</p>
<p>No matter your personal position on the issue, almost everyone can agree that it would be preferable to have some kind of plan in place for your, your parents&#8217; and other family members&#8217; care than to have to scramble at the last minute and then spend your entire nest egg.</p>
<p>Nationally, spending on home health aides, <a title="Nursing" href="safari-reader://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/health/medical-specialization/nursing-HEMSP000015.topic">nursing</a> home and other care for the elderly is projected to triple over the next few decades. Once you turn 65, there&#8217;s a 70 percent chance that you will need some help with the tasks of daily living at some point: things like brushing your teeth, bathing, getting dressed, and taking medications correctly. Medicare and regular health plans don&#8217;t cover this type of care.</p>
<p>In recent years, more and more families are turning to long-term care insurance policies to cover the gaps. I spoke to Thomas Kenyon, whose firm Florida Long Term Care Planners specializes in these kinds of policies, about what you should have in mind when shopping for long-term care insurance.</p>
<p>1) Don&#8217;t buy too much.</p>
<p>The benefit on a long-term care insurance policy is generally structured as a fixed daily amount over a certain period up to a cap. You can typically start the clock on the benefit and begin to access the dollars when you have a &#8220;long-term care event&#8221; such as breaking a hip, or a stroke, where doctors expect you to need help with the tasks of daily living for at least 90 days. Kenyon says that many salespeople will try to sell you a policy designed to cover the cost of several years of nursing home care, which averaged $239 a day in 2011 according to the annual<a title="MetLife Incorporated" href="safari-reader://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/economy-business-finance/metlife-incorporated-ORCRP009862.topic">MetLife</a> survey. However, you can get a much more affordable policy by structuring a benefit package that also includes time with a home health aide, at $19 to $21 an hour by the same survey, or adult day care. In some cases just 10 to 15 hours of respite care a week can be enough to allow people to remain in their homes.</p>
<p>2) Don&#8217;t wait too long.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll save significantly &#8212; not just now, but likely over the lifetime of the policy &#8212; if you buy a policy when you&#8217;re under 60 and healthy. A quarter of the people who come to Kenyon have pre-existing health conditions that cause them to be denied coverage at any price.</p>
<p>3) Consider the &#8220;restoration of benefits&#8221; rider, and the other fine print.</p>
<p>A good policy should cover several types of care, from adult day care to nursing home care. You should understand exactly what standards you have to meet to trigger the benefits, and it shouldn&#8217;t exclude any pre-existing conditions you do have. One additional rider that Kenyon especially recommends is called &#8220;restoration of benefits.&#8221; Let&#8217;s say you fall down the stairs at 72. You can start spending the benefits today for a home health aide. But once you recover, the &#8220;restoration of benefits&#8221; rider allows you to stop that clock. If you stay well for six months the pool of dollars is restored as if nothing ever happened.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By Anya Kamenetz, published on www.chicagotribune.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/tips-for-buying-long-term-care-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who gets health insurance rebates under new law</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/who-gets-health-insurance-rebates-under-new-law/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/who-gets-health-insurance-rebates-under-new-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rebates totaling $1.3 billion from health insurance companies should go to more than 3 million individual policyholders and thousands of employers this year because of President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care law, a report from the Kaiser Family Foundation says.</p> <p>Here&#8217;s how the law works:</p> <p>— Insurers covering individual consumers and small employers must spend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebates totaling $1.3 billion from health insurance companies should go to more than 3 million individual policyholders and thousands of employers this year because of President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care law, a report from the Kaiser Family Foundation says.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how the law works:</p>
<p>— Insurers covering individual consumers and small employers must spend at least 80 percent of the premiums they collect on medical care and quality improvements. The benchmark is 85 percent of premiums for insurers covering large employers.</p>
<p>— Insurance companies must provide rebates if they do not meet those standards.</p>
<p>Who gets refunds:</p>
<p>— Almost one-third of consumers in the individual market will get rebates averaging $127. These are consumers who are not covered by an employer and purchase their policies directly from an insurance company.</p>
<p>— Average amounts will vary significantly by state. The highest will be paid to consumers in Alaska (average of $305), Maryland ($294) and Pennsylvania ($243). On the opposite side of the scale, no individual market insurers in Hawaii, Maine and Washington, D.C., expect to issue rebates.</p>
<p>— Nationwide, rebates to individual consumers will total $426 million.</p>
<p>— In the small employer market, 146 insurance plans covering nearly 5 million workers and dependents will issue $377 million in refunds. Employers do not have to pass those on to workers. They can also opt for a discount on next year&#8217;s premiums.</p>
<p>—In the large employer market, 125 plans covering 7.5 million workers and dependents will issue $541 million in rebates.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By The Associated Press, published on http://abcnews.go.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/05/who-gets-health-insurance-rebates-under-new-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: One in four Americans without health insurance coverage</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/study-one-in-four-americans-without-health-insurance-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/study-one-in-four-americans-without-health-insurance-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“For people who lose employer-sponsored coverage, the individual market is often the only alternative, but it is a confusing and largely unaffordable option,” said Commonwealth Fund Vice President Sara Collins, lead author of the report. “As a result, people are going a year, two years, or more without health care coverage, and as a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“For people who lose employer-sponsored coverage, the individual market is often the only alternative, but it is a confusing and largely unaffordable option,” said Commonwealth Fund Vice President Sara Collins, lead author of the report. “As a result, people are going a year, two years, or more without health care coverage, and as a result going without needed care.”</p>
<p>A new survey, the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Tracking Survey of U.S. Adults, finds that a quarter of the adult population ages 19 to 64 experienced a gap in health insurance in 2011. Nearly seven of 10 (69%) of those with a gap went without coverage for a year or more. Of those who were uninsured at the time of the survey or were insured but had experienced a gap, 41 percent previously had employer-based coverage, 18 percent had been enrolled in Medicaid, 6 percent had a plan purchased in the individual market, 7 percent had been insured through another source, and 27 percent never had health insurance. Among those who had employer-sponsored insurance prior to their gap in coverage, two-thirds (67%) cited a loss or change of a job as the primary reason; nearly six of 10 (58%) were uninsured for a year or more.</p>
<p>The individual market has proven to be a weak stop-gap option for families who lose employer insurance. In the survey, adults who tried to buy a plan on their own in the individual insurance market reported substantial difficulties finding affordable health plans that met their health needs. Of adults who tried to buy a plan in the individual market in the past three years, 60 percent found it very or somewhat difficult to compare the benefits covered by different plans and more than half (55%) found it very or somewhat difficult to compare premium costs. More than two of five (45%) never ended up buying a plan. Cost was the most often cited reason for not purchasing a plan.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>The recession that began in 2008 revealed the degree to which health insurance coverage in the United States depends on whether people have jobs and if those jobs include health benefits. The Commonwealth Fund found that over 2008–2010, more than half of adults—an estimated 9 million people—who lost a job with health benefits became uninsured.2 Very few people enrolled in continuation coverage through COBRA or found a plan on the individual insurance market. The sluggish recovery has meant that millions of those workers remain uninsured: a record 5.3 million people have been searching for a job for longer than six months.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>People who do not have access to employer health benefits and are ineligible for Medicaid are largely limited to purchasing coverage in the individual market. But the individual market for most Americans is neither affordable nor easy to navigate. People buying coverage in the individual market must pay the full premium and, under current laws in most states, are rated on the basis of their health, gender, and age. They can also be denied coverage because of a preexisting condition or have their condition excluded from their health plan.</p>
<p><img title="" src="https://www.commondreams.org/sites/commondreams.org/files/imagecache/headline_image/article_images/gaps_in_coverage.jpg" alt="" width="275" height="324" /></p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>In the survey, while nearly all (92%) adults who were continuously insured reported they had a regular doctor, doctors’ group, health center, or clinic where they usually went for medical care, those with gaps in coverage were much less likely to have a regular source of care, with rates declining with the length of time uninsured. Among adults who had been uninsured for less than one year, three quarters (76%) reported having a regular doctor. But, of those adults who had spent one year or more without health insurance, fewer than half (46%) reported having a regular source of care.</p>
<p>Similarly, adults with a gap in their health insurance were less likely to be up to date with preventive care tests than were those who were continuously insured. While 83 percent of adults who were insured all year had had their blood pressure checked in the past year, the rate declined to 70 percent among those who had experienced a gap in their health insurance of less than a year and to 51 percent among those who had been without coverage for a year or longer. Likewise, 70 percent of adults who had been continuously insured had their cholesterol checked in the past five years (or in the past year for those with hypertension or heart disease) compared with half of adults who had been uninsured for under a year and one-third (33%) of adults who were uninsured for a year or more.</p>
<p>Recommended cancer screening rates were also far lower among adults who experienced disruptions in their coverage compared with those who were continuously insured. Three-quarters (74%) of women ages 40 to 64 who were insured all year reported that they had a mammogram in the past two years. But only 28 percent of women in that age group who had been uninsured for a year or more said that they had a mammogram in the recommended time frame. Similarly, 72 percent of women who were insured continuously had a Pap test in the recommended time frame compared with fewer than half (46%) who experienced a gap in coverage of a year or longer. Colon cancer screening rates were low among adults who were insured all year, but extremely rare among adults who had long gaps in coverage. Fifty-seven percent of continuously insured adults ages 50 to 64 reported that they had a colon cancer screening in the past five years while fewer than one of 10 (9%) adults who had been uninsured for a year or more reported that they had received the test.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Written and published by www.commondreams.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/study-one-in-four-americans-without-health-insurance-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linked Long Term Care Insurance Attracting Younger Buyers</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/linked-long-term-care-insurance-attracting-younger-buyers/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/linked-long-term-care-insurance-attracting-younger-buyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To protect against the risk of needing costly long-term care an increasing number of national insurance companies are offering protection that combines life insurance with potential long term care insurance benefits. According to the 2012 Buyer Study conducted by the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance, these linked benefit (also called &#8220;combination&#8221;) products are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To protect against the risk of needing costly long-term care an increasing number of national insurance companies are offering protection that combines life insurance with potential long term care insurance benefits. According to the 2012 Buyer Study conducted by the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance, these linked benefit (also called &#8220;combination&#8221;) products are gaining favor with individuals in their 40s and 50s.</p>
<p>The Association&#8217;s annual study of leading insurers found that 53 percent of buyers of these hybrid policies were under age 65 in 2011 compared to only 48 percent in 2010. Some 42.5 percent of male and 38.5 percent of female buyers were between ages 55 and 64 explains Jesse Slome, director of the national trade group. Nearly one in 10 buyers was between 45 and 54.</p>
<p>&#8220;A linked benefit policy has advantages that many pre-retirement consumers find attractive,&#8221; Slome notes. Policies can fund expenses when qualifying long-term care is needed at home or in a skilled care facility. Some linked, or hybrid products, allow unused benefits to pass to named beneficiaries income tax-free. &#8220;At a time when long-term care is increasingly top of mind, these life insurance-based solutions avoid the &#8216;use it or lose it&#8217; risk associated with traditional long term care insurance,&#8221; says Chris Coudret, CLU, ChFC, Vice President, OneAmerica one of the nation&#8217;s leading insurers offering linked benefit solutions. &#8220;In most cases, people make a single payment, effectively removing the risk of future premium increases.&#8221;</p>
<p>The AALTCI study reported sales for the participating linked benefit insurers increased 14 percent in 2011 and the premium increased almost 20 percent. To learn more or obtain long term care insurance costs from an Association member call (818) 597-3227 or visit the organization&#8217;s website www.aaltci.org .</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>RELATED LINKS</p>
<p>http://www.aaltci.org</p>
<p>http://www.aaltci.org/long-term-care-insurance</p>
<p>About American Association for Long-Term Care InsuranceEstablished in 1998, AALTCI is the national trade organization established to create heightened awareness regarding the importance of planning for long term care. To access or read three free consumer guides outlining ways to reduce costs for long-term care insurance visit the Association website http://www.aaltci.org/long-term-care-insurance-costs/</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By Jesse Slome, published on www.marketwatch.com</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/linked-long-term-care-insurance-attracting-younger-buyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you know your child could be a target for identity theft?</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/do-you-know-your-child-could-be-a-target-for-identity-theft/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/do-you-know-your-child-could-be-a-target-for-identity-theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine that you&#8217;ve taught your child everything they need to know about personal finance. Then as he&#8217;s getting ready to head off to college and applies for financial aid, he&#8217;s unexpectedly rejected for financial aid due to poor credit. Yet he&#8217;s never applied for credit in his life. Sounds outrageous, doesn&#8217;t it? But this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine that you&#8217;ve taught your child everything they need to know about personal finance. Then as he&#8217;s getting ready to head off to college and applies for financial aid, he&#8217;s unexpectedly rejected for financial aid due to poor credit. Yet he&#8217;s never applied for credit in his life. Sounds outrageous, doesn&#8217;t it? But this can happen to victims of <a href="http://blog.equifax.com/credit/protecting-the-innocent-the-basics-of-child-identity-theft/" target="_blank">child identity theft</a>.</p>
<p>Most Americans are aware that identity theft is a significant problem, and that it&#8217;s important to take measures to protect your identity. What people might not know is their children may also be targets of identity theft before they even become old enough to own a credit card. The <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/09/childtheft.shtm" target="_blank">Federal Trade Commission</a> has identified child identity theft as a growing problem and encourages parents to do what they can to minimize the risks to their children.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>How does it happen?</strong></p>
<p>The most common way a criminal can steal or misuse the identity of a child is to get access to the child&#8217;s Social Security number. The perpetrator then uses the Social Security number to open credit card accounts or loans, rent an apartment, sign up for utilities like cell phone service, or even apply for a job. Credit issuers often don&#8217;t have a way to verify the age of the applicant, so if the criminal changes the age of the identity associated with your child, it&#8217;s possible that the issuer may approve them for credit, according to the <a href="http://www.idtheftcenter.org/artman2/publish/v_fact_sheets/Fact_Sheet_120.shtml" target="_blank">Identity Theft Resource Center</a>.</p>
<p>Once an account has been established in your child&#8217;s name, it&#8217;s easier for criminals to establish subsequent accounts until this fraud is discovered. If your child&#8217;s identity is stolen at an early age and the theft goes undiscovered until she reaches the age where she begins to establish her own credit, it can be very difficult to discover how the fraud first occurred.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>How can you help prevent it?</strong></p>
<p>Parents can take a number of steps to help prevent their children from becoming identity theft victims:</p>
<p>* Store your children&#8217;s Social Security cards in a safe place like a safety deposit box. Only give out your children&#8217;s Social Security number when it&#8217;s absolutely necessary, and provide alternate verification whenever possible.</p>
<p>* Teach your children to never reveal personal information to anyone, no matter how trustworthy that person may seem. People close to the family are often found to be perpetrators in child identity theft cases.</p>
<p>* If your child receives pre-approved credit card offers in the mail, you may want to check in with a credit reporting agency or Social Security. If you&#8217;ve been contacted by a collection agency regarding an account in your child&#8217;s name, there&#8217;s a possibility your child&#8217;s identity was stolen.</p>
<p>* Consider signing up your family members for a credit monitoring and identity protection solution such as the Equifax Complete(TM) <a href="http://www.equifax.com/family/" target="_blank">Family Plan</a>, which can help to protect two adults and up to four minor children. With this product, you will be notified of any changes or suspicious activity on your adult credit files; in addition, you can monitor your minor child&#8217;s identifying information for existence of an Equifax credit file and lock it, thereby preventing creditors from accessing this file while the child is enrolled in the plan.</p>
<p>By taking a few extra precautions to protect your children&#8217;s identities, you can help ensure they get off on the right foot as they become adults and begin establishing their own credit histories.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By ARA, published on www.jsonline.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/do-you-know-your-child-could-be-a-target-for-identity-theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bundled policy for long-term care too costly</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/bundled-policy-for-long-term-care-too-costly/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/bundled-policy-for-long-term-care-too-costly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Long Term Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paying for long-term care is a worry for many, particularly aging baby boomers. Certified financial planner Kevin Young of Young Wealth Management in Davis, Calif., offers some advice on the topic:</p> <p>Q: I’m 65 and interested in getting long-term-care coverage. My financial adviser recommends a life-insurance policy, which has a long-term-care benefit, that costs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paying for long-term care is a worry for many, particularly aging baby boomers. Certified financial planner Kevin Young of Young Wealth Management in Davis, Calif., offers some advice on the topic:</p>
<p>Q: I’m 65 and interested in getting long-term-care coverage. My financial adviser recommends a life-insurance policy, which has a long-term-care benefit, that costs upfront about $70,000. The selling feature is that they refund your premium if you don’t use the long-term care after 20 years. A regular long-term care policy will cost $3,500 annually because of my age. My husband and I have about $400,000 in IRAs. Would it be a good move to protect these investments by buying either the regular long-term-care policy for me or the life-insurance policy that includes long-term-care benefits?</p>
<p>A: Health insurance and Medicare do not cover the expense of long-term care. If your net worth is mainly your IRA balance and your primary residence, buying LTCI/life insurance might not be the best use of your limited resources.</p>
<p>The policy being sold to you is known as a combination policy or bundled policy. It’s a life-insurance policy with a long-term-care insurance rider, which can be used to pay for long-term-care expenses. The pitch from insurance agents who sell this type of policy is that, if you don’t use the long-term-care benefit, you will have a death benefit.</p>
<p>The death benefit is reduced dollar for dollar when you use the long-term-care portion of the life-insurance policy. Combination policies such as this are expensive and do not offer a good value.</p>
<p>The drawbacks to these types of policies include high costs; couples cannot share the pool of long-term-care benefits; long-term-care benefits might be limited; and benefits might not keep up with future long-term-care costs.</p>
<p><strong>By  Claudia Buck<br />
</strong></p>
<p>M cCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/bundled-policy-for-long-term-care-too-costly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Older Workers Don&#8217;t Know About Social Security</title>
		<link>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/what-older-workers-dont-know-about-social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/what-older-workers-dont-know-about-social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people on the verge of retirement lack knowledge about how Social Security works. Most older workers can&#8217;t identify basic information about the Social Security calculation, including how many years of earnings are factored into their payout and how much their payments will increase due to delayed claiming, according to a recent AARP and Knowledge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Many people on the verge of retirement lack knowledge about how Social Security works. Most older workers can&#8217;t identify basic information about the <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/articles/2011/08/01/how-to-predict-your-social-security-payout" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080;">Social Security calculation</span></a>, including how many years of earnings are factored into their payout and how much their payments will increase due to delayed claiming, according to a recent AARP and Knowledge Networks online survey of 2,053 people ages 52 to 70 who plan to claim Social Security within the next 15 years. Here is what most people in their 50s and 60s don&#8217;t know about Social Security:</div>
<div><strong>How many years of work are factored into the payout</strong>. Social Security benefits are calculated based on your 35 highest-paid years in the workforce, but only 7 percent of survey respondents knew this. Most older workers guessed that the five (30 percent) or 10 (21 percent) years in which they earned the highest salary would be used to calculate their benefit amount.</div>
<div><strong>You can get more than 30 percent <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/slideshows/10-ways-to-boost-your-social-security-checks" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080;">bigger payments</span></a> by waiting to claim</strong>. Most people (89 percent) know that their monthly Social Security payments will be bigger if they wait until their full retirement age to sign up for benefits instead of claiming at age 62. But very few people can identify exactly how much more they&#8217;ll receive. &#8220;One thing that they generally know is that if you delay your claiming decision even a year, you will get a boost in your benefit, but when you actually ask them how much, they have no sense of what that actual amount is,&#8221; says Jean Setzfand, AARP vice president for financial security. Only about a quarter (or 29 percent) of the survey respondents were able to estimate the percentage increase within 10 percentage points of the actual increase. For the survey respondents who are between ages 52 and 70, the increase in payments for delaying claiming from 62 until full retirement age ranges from 30.5 percent to 41.2 percent. Most of the survey respondents underestimated the value of waiting to claim their Social Security benefits.</div>
<div><strong>Your payments could increase by 8 percent annually after your full retirement age</strong>. The majority of older workers (62 percent) know that their monthly payments will increase even more if they delay claiming past their full retirement age. But only 34 percent of those surveyed were able to identify a percentage increase that was within 2 percentage points of the actual increase. For most people in the age group surveyed, Social Security checks will grow by 8 percent for each year of delayed claiming beyond their full retirement age, up until age 70. Most of the survey respondents overestimated the benefit of delaying claiming after their full retirement age. &#8220;If you expect to live well beyond 80, you will maximize your benefit by claiming at 70. If you expect to die at three or more years before 80, then you will maximize your benefit by claiming at age 62,&#8221; says William Reichenstein, a Baylor University professor and principal of Social Security Solutions. &#8220;You get two-thirds of 1 percent more for each month of delay. You could get 32 percent more by waiting until 70.&#8221;</div>
<div><strong>The age you can receive the highest possible monthly benefit</strong>. Social Security payouts grow for each year of delayed claiming up until age 70. After age 70, there is no additional benefit to waiting to <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/planning-to-retire/2011/12/16/patty-duke-signs-up-for-social-security" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080;">sign up</span></a>. But only 29 percent of those surveyed were able to identify age 70 as the year they would max out their benefit. Many people (41 percent) incorrectly guessed that it was between ages 65 and 67.</div>
<div><strong>How the earnings test works</strong>. People who work and claim Social Security benefits at the same time before their full retirement age may see a temporary reduction in their Social Security payments if they earn too much. The earnings limit is $14,640 in 2012 for people below their full retirement age, above which 50 cents of each dollar earned is deducted from Social Security payments. For beneficiaries who will turn 66 in 2012, the earnings limit is $38,880, after which 33 cents of each dollar is withheld. While most older workers (76 percent) are aware of the earnings test, 71 percent incorrectly believe the reduction in benefits is permanent. Once you reach full retirement age, your checks will be recalculated to factor in any withheld benefit and your continued work record. &#8220;Most people who work before full retirement age are going to lose much, if not all, of the benefit, but there is an adjustment later,&#8221; says Reichenstein. &#8220;When they hit full retirement age, they raise the benefit amount.&#8221; And once you turn your retirement age, there is no penalty for working and collecting retirement benefits at the same time.</div>
<div><strong>Spouses can claim benefits. </strong>Only about half (48 percent) of those who are married or who have ever been married are aware that they&#8217;re eligible for Social Security spousal benefits. <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/articles/2010/04/26/6-ways-couples-can-maximize-social-security-payouts" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080;">Spousal payments</span></a> can be worth as much as 50 percent of the higher earner&#8217;s Social Security payment. Dual-earner couples who have reached their full retirement age can even claim Social Security twice by signing up for spousal payments, then later switching to payments based on their own work record. &#8220;If both members of the couple wait until the full retirement age of 66, then either one of the spouses could begin receiving a spousal benefit based on the other spouse&#8217;s record, and then continue to delay their benefit up until age 70, which would then maximize both of their benefits,&#8221; says Jim Blankenship, a certified financial planner for Blankenship Financial Planning in New Berlin, Ill., and author of <em>A Social Security Owner&#8217;s Manual</em>.</div>
<div><strong>How to maximize widow and widower&#8217;s benefits</strong>. Almost all older workers (95 percent) know that widows and widowers can collect <a href="http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/planning-to-retire/2012/03/16/social-security-to-go-paperless-in-2013" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080;">Social Security benefits</span></a> based on the earning record of the deceased spouse. Most people (78 percent) also correctly report that the age the deceased spouse signed up for benefits affects how much the surviving spouse will get. But only 52 percent of respondents correctly reported that the age the surviving spouse claims benefits can also affect how much he or she will be paid. To receive the maximum widow or widower&#8217;s benefit, the surviving spouse must claim no earlier than his or her full retirement age. &#8220;Typically, the higher-earning spouse is the husband. The later that he waits to [receive] benefits, the higher the survivor&#8217;s benefit will be at his demise,&#8221; says Blankenship. &#8220;If he began receiving benefits early, at age 62, that would permanently reduce the amount that his wife could receive as a spousal benefit and the survivor&#8217;s benefit she could receive upon his passing.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div>By Emily Brandon | U.S.News &amp; World Report LP – <abbr title="2012-04-02T15:39:01Z">Mon, Apr 2, 2012 11:39 AM EDT</abbr></div>
<div>Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/aiming2retire" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080;">@aiming2retire</span></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benefitspecialists.biz/blog/2012/04/what-older-workers-dont-know-about-social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

